by Dagny Taggart and Josh Taylor
“We now have misplaced our minds. We now have stated goodbye to any semblance of rationality or evaluation of information and stated hiya to illogical alarmism. A virus we must always have been diligent and cautious about has was a virus we must always worry, quit our liberty for, and basically alter our lives to keep away from.” – Alyssa Algren
We live in attention-grabbing and troubling instances.
Consider Science. Except They Inform You To not.
The individuals pushing Covid-19 vaccines on everybody inform us to “belief the science” and “imagine science.” However in case you dare to say the just lately printed peer-reviewed paper on Ivermectin: Ivermectin for Prevention and Therapy of COVID-19 An infection, you’ll seemingly be met with scorn and mock.
After sharing the hyperlink on my Fb web page individuals commented issues like “Ew, quackery” and numerous anti-Ivermectin/pro-vaccination feedback. It is very important word that the individuals criticizing the research didn’t learn it as a result of, hey, why trouble? Everybody has an (uninformed) opinion as of late, and so they aren’t afraid to indicate it.
Within the article Do You Consider Science? former scientist John McLaughlin aptly states:
Consider science has turn into a comforting social media slogan amid the previous yr’s chaos, however this platitude has an undertone that runs opposite to the true spirit of scientific inquiry. All too usually imagine science means obey authority and is used as a technique to shut down debate. Science is assumed to reign supreme.
Query. Each. Factor.
Science is asking questions, observing, experimenting, hypothesizing, and testing. Science is steady studying and buying new data. It’s by no means “completed” or “settled.” Science gathers knowledge and evaluates it to kind and refine theories. What’s believed to be “reality” at present doesn’t assure contradictory proof will current tomorrow.
For the previous yr and a half, we now have obtained conflicting and contradictory data concerning the virus. (To be anticipated throughout an ever-changing occasion involving a brand new and unfamiliar pathogen.) Nonetheless, “consultants” are permitted to alter the narrative as issues progress. In the meantime, the remainder of us are anticipated to “belief” their steering. Questions and skepticism are discouraged.
In What If We’re Flawed? evolutionary biologist and writer Dr. Heather Heying poses the next questions:
- What if SARS-CoV2 leaked from a lab?
- What if there are long-term results of mRNA vaccines?
- What if Ivermectin is secure and efficient as each a prophylaxis towards and a therapy for COVID-19?
These are cheap questions worthy of exploration to hunt solutions.
Large Tech’s Large Want to Silence Dissent
Dr. Heying factors out, those that ask questions like those above are known as conspiracy theorists, “and worse”:
Our intentions have been questioned. We now have been informed to maintain quiet. Some have self-censored, and others have been dropped at heel by Large Tech. The powers that be at Google, as an example, had an official coverage as of Could 2021, which incorporates this line: “YouTube doesn’t enable content material that spreads medical misinformation that contradicts native well being authorities or the World Well being Group’s (WHO) medical details about COVID-19.”
This coverage basically misunderstands science—native well being authorities and the WHO might be improper, as can all of us. Being improper isn’t any crime (though prevaricating to additional your personal agenda when lives are on the road is tantamount to at least one). Shutting down the voices of those that query your conclusions—whereas not felony—is antithetical to science.
When scientific pondering and a cautious evaluation of the scientific literature results in a special conclusion than the declarations of the authorities, what path does #followthescience recommend? Science doesn’t function by authority, however #followthescience is getting used as a bludgeon to silence individuals into compliance. Freedom of expression is required if science is to operate. Those that are participating in silencing are doing neither science, nor humanity, any favours.
YouTube’s Official Coverage Might Sacrifice World Well being
Dr. Heying continues:
YouTube’s official “COVID-19 medical misinformation coverage” additional prohibits any claims that Ivermectin is an efficient therapy for COVID-19. This regardless of considerable proof that Ivermectin is an efficient therapy for COVID-19, together with from international locations the place it was already in widespread prophylactic use towards different pathogens.
If the efficacy of Ivermectin in treating COVID-19, prompt by many peer-reviewed scientific papers, is borne out, YouTube can be revealed to have been taking part in a really harmful sport certainly. How a lot well being—particular person and financial—can be sacrificed globally on this altar? It’s censorship in science’s clothes. Look intently, and you will see that that this has little to do with science. A censor sporting a lab coat continues to be a censor, and censorship is basically incompatible with science.
Moreover, even when Ivermectin proves to be little assist towards COVID-19, the sport being performed by those that stand against free expression continues to be harmful. Insurance policies like that of YouTube, which quash dialogue and silence debate, faux to be pro-science, however they’re the alternative. It is a new orthodoxy stamping out heterodoxy, but once more.
YouTube is Not the Solely Platform Engaged in Info Suppression
Fb has slapped numerous warnings and disclaimers on posts that dare to say Covid. Write a submit containing the V phrases (virus, vaccines, vaccination), and medicines like Ivermectin and you’ll obtain warning.
Nonetheless, Fb additionally slaps these warnings on posts with NOTHING to do with Covid. I skilled this final month due to a submit I wrote that had nothing to do with the virus, vaccines, or Ivermectin. Or ANYTHING associated to the pandemic, for that matter. The platform hooked up a warning to my submit anyway.
So, I wrote a submit about Fb placing a warning on a non-Covid submit. Warnings have been additionally utilized to that submit. If it weren’t so disturbing, it could be amusing:
Talking of Ivermectin
It seems peer-reviewed scientific papers that help its use as each a prophylactic and therapy for Covid DO EXIST. One was printed just lately. Right here’s the conclusion from that research:
Conclusions: Average-certainty proof finds that giant reductions in COVID-19 deaths are attainable utilizing ivermectin. Utilizing ivermectin early within the medical course could cut back numbers progressing to extreme illness. The obvious security and low price recommend that ivermectin is more likely to have a big influence on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
Entrance Line COVID-19 Crucial Care Alliance (FLCCC Alliance) shares data on numerous Covid-19 therapy protocols. The Alliance has been doing so since March 2020. The FLCCC was shaped by “a gaggle of extremely printed, world-renowned Crucial Care doctor/students – with the tutorial help of allied physicians from around the globe – to analysis and develop lifesaving protocols for the prevention and therapy of COVID-19 in all phases of sickness.”
Is it Secure or Isn’t it, Merck?
Way back to early February, multinational drug firm Merck contributed to the demonization of Ivermectin with statements to the impact of:
- ) there isn’t any proof that Ivermectin works for COVID-19
- ) there’s a “regarding lack of security knowledge within the majority of research,” suggesting that the drug could also be unsafe.”
For a drug that has a “lack of security knowledge” and which “could also be unsafe,” Merck had no downside donating billions of doses of Ivermectin to battle river blindness in plagued third-world international locations.
So both it isn’t secure, and Merck has no downside sending unsafe medicines to third-world international locations. Or it’s secure, and Merck deliberately tries to cover a probably efficient therapy for COVID from the world.
Wait. There’s a Bit Extra to the Story.
Merck could have a monetary curiosity in hiding Ivermectin’s security and effectiveness. Why? As a result of Merck has developed and subsequently entered right into a provide settlement with the US authorities for Molupiravir, an “investigational oral antiviral” drug.
Simply learn Merck’s web site:
Merck (NYSE: MRK), generally known as MSD exterior america and Canada, at present introduced it has entered right into a procurement settlement with america authorities for molnupiravir (MK-4482). Molnupiravir is at the moment being evaluated in a Part 3 medical trial, the MOVe-OUT research, for the therapy of non-hospitalized sufferers with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and at the very least one threat issue related to poor illness outcomes. Merck is growing molnupiravir in collaboration with Ridgeback Biotherapeutics.
“Merck is happy to collaborate with the U.S. authorities on this new settlement that may present People with COVID-19 entry to molnupiravir – an investigational oral remedy being studied for outpatient use early in the midst of illness – whether it is approved or accepted,” stated Rob Davis, president, Merck. “Along with this settlement with the U.S. authorities, we’re actively engaged in quite a few efforts to make molnupiravir accessible globally to satisfy Merck’s dedication to widespread entry.”
By means of the settlement, if molnupiravir receives Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) or approval by the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA), Merck will obtain roughly $1.2 billion to produce roughly 1.7 million programs of molnupiravir to america authorities. Merck has been investing in danger to help improvement and scale-up manufacturing of molnupiravir and expects to have greater than 10 million programs of remedy accessible by the tip of 2021.
Are the folks that disgrace, stress, and bribe with “freebie incentives” (beer, donuts, blended drinks, cheesecakes, and different unhealthy “rewards”) conscious that safer remedies/preventatives exist? (Ivermectin) And are these individuals conscious of the hazards related to vaccines?
I’d say it’s seemingly that they’re.
Breakthrough Circumstances Among the many Vaccinated
The CDC stopped counting “breakthrough instances” (instances of an infection in vaccinated people) except extreme incapacity or loss of life occurred. Solely 45% of the eligible inhabitants is totally vaccinated, in line with the CDC. There was a spike within the vaccination fee in April. Since then, doses given have dramatically decreased, as proven in this graph from the CDC.
From The New York Occasions article: Many scientists agree: Accumulating extra knowledge is all the time preferable to accumulating much less. “The virus is consistently altering, and we have to keep three steps forward of it,” stated Michael Kinch, an immunologist and affiliate vice-chancellor of the Facilities for Analysis Innovation in Biotechnology at Washington College in St. Louis.
“What if a variant arises that’s much less responsive or, Lord forbid, unresponsive to the vaccines?” he stated. “The best way you cease it’s good old school epidemiology, which the C.D.C. has traditionally carried out very properly. However in case you don’t see it coming, you possibly can’t cease it.”
The Mainstream Is Getting on Board a Little Tiny Bit
A few issues have just lately appeared in additional mainstream retailers that recommend – possibly – simply possibly – Ivermectin works. This one on Yahoo refers to it as a “low-cost hair lice tablet from the UK” as if it hasn’t been available throughout the US for years. This text from a much less mainstream supply suggests the suppression of Ivermectin is nothing lower than felony.
What number of lifeless family members might need lived if we’d truly “adopted the science?”
Vaccine Hostile Occasion Reporting System Backlogged
VAERS, a notoriously tough system used to categorise vaccine accidents as what they’re, was backlogged again in Could. VAERS solely covers america and the experiences symbolize a fraction of precise opposed reactions. The backlog received to the purpose the place many individuals reported points with the system itself, receiving error messages, experiences failing to submit, and many others.
Youngsters’s Well being Protection reported:
There are various limitations to acquiring correct up-to-date data from VAERS. First, VAERS web site knowledge is sort of by no means present — reported opposed occasions and deaths are sometimes backlogged, hardly ever entered in a well timed vogue. The truth is, the web site even particulars its personal limitations: “The variety of experiences alone can’t be interpreted or used to succeed in conclusions in regards to the existence, severity, frequency, or charges of issues related to vaccines… knowledge are topic to limitations of under-reporting, reporting bias, and lack of incidence charges in unvaccinated comparability teams.” VAERS can’t reveal causation. Regardless of these recognized limitations, VAERS is the one vaccine opposed occasion reporting system accessible to the general public.
9 New Vaccine Billionaires
Regardless of accessible potential remedies for COVID and the drastic variety of vaccine accidents from the COVID vaccine, the shot basically created a brand new billionaire class out of builders, producers, and sellers of the vaccines.
As The Defender experiences:
A brand new report reveals the worldwide push to develop a vaccine for COVID-19 has spawned 9 new “vaccine billionaires” who’ve amassed a mixed web wealth of $19.3 billion.
The writer of the report, Folks’s Vaccine Alliance, stated the pharmaceutical trade’s monopoly on COVID vaccines has generated an enormous enhance in wealth for a handful of individuals.
Along with the 9 new “vaccine billionaires,” the coalition of well being and humanitarian organizations, world leaders, and economists stated “eight present billionaires — who’ve intensive portfolios within the COVID-19 vaccine pharma firms — have seen their mixed wealth enhance by $32.2 billion.”
Right here’s a List of the 9 Billionaires
The article lists the 9 Vaccine Billionaires and their present web value in billions. (B)
- Stéphane Bancel – CEO Moderna: $4.3 B
- Ugur Sahin – CEO | Co-founder BioNTech: $4 B
- Timothy Springer – Founding Investor Moderna: $2.2 B
- Noubar Afeyan – Moderna Chairman: $1.9 B
- Juan Lopez-Belmonte – Chairman Rovi: $1.8 B
- Robert Langer – Founding Investor Moderna: $1.6 B
- Zhu Tao – Co-founder | Chief Scientific Officer CanSino Biologics: $1.3 B
- Qiu Dongxu – Co-founder | Senior Vice President CanSino Biologics: $1.2 B
- Mao Huihua – Co-founder | Senior Vice President CanSino Biologics: $1 B
Conclusion
Ivermectin is one in every of a number of probably secure and efficient remedies for COVID recognized to the scientific neighborhood. However, for the purpose cited above, nobody else is aware of. Monopolies upon monopolies. It’s astounding how a lot cash an organization makes when lots of shoppers are terrified or pressured into shopping for its merchandise.
We must be enraged over how many individuals could have died due to a coordinated and deliberate effort to suppress analysis that didn’t profit Large Pharma and a forcible vaccine agenda.
The Courageous New World is right here. It’s time for People to take a stand earlier than it’s too late. The door of alternative will quickly shut.
Different helpful hyperlinks you’ll want to take a look at!
- YouTube took this video down! Wonderful podcast that includes Dr. Kory and Bret Weinstein
- Right here are the newest outcomes on utilizing Ivermectin in numerous international locations.
- This hyperlink is an effective useful resource for real-time information on Ivermectin use/research.
- And right here’s one other article by Dr. Joseph Mercola, suggesting that Ivermectin might have saved tens of millions of lives had it not been shamefully censored and demonized.
- Bret Weinstein’s Darkish Horse podcast with company Dr. Robert Malone (creator of mRNA tech) and engineer/philanthropist Steve Kirsch: The way to save the world, in three straightforward steps
- Steve Kirsch’s paperwork on the vaccines.
About Dagny
Dagny Taggart is the pseudonym of an expert journalist who wants to keep up anonymity to maintain her job within the public eye. Dagny is non-partisan and goals to show the half-truths, misrepresentations, and blatant lies of the MSM.
Source link
